When designing a strategy for internet-bound traffic routing in a landing zone, what should be recommended?

When designing a strategy for internet-bound traffic routing in a landing zone, what should be recommended?

• A. Service mirroring
• B. Service chaining
• C. Network segmentation
• D. Load balancing

Answer: (B)

Service chaining is a strategy that efficiently manages internet-bound traffic routing by allowing different network and security services to be applied to the traffic flow in a specified sequence. This approach ensures that traffic passes through a series of designated services, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and web proxies, before reaching its final destination. Implementing service chaining provides several advantages, such as enhanced visibility, improved security posture, and the ability to enforce policies consistently across the entire traffic path. It allows for the integration of various services seamlessly, ensuring that all necessary security measures are engaged without needing to rewrite network architecture or traffic flows extensively. Other options, like service mirroring, network segmentation, and load balancing, while important in their own contexts, don’t specifically address the routing of internet-bound traffic in the same systematic and service-oriented way that service chaining does. For instance, service mirroring generally focuses on copying traffic for analysis rather than controlling traffic flow; network segmentation emphasizes isolating parts of a network for security but does not specifically facilitate internet traffic flow; and load balancing is primarily about distributing traffic loads to ensure optimal performance, rather than managing the routing of traffic through multiple security services. Therefore, service chaining is the most suitable recommendation for designing a comprehensive strategy for internet-bound

Service chaining is a strategy that efficiently manages internet-bound traffic routing by allowing different network and security services to be applied to the traffic flow in a specified sequence. This approach ensures that traffic passes through a series of designated services, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and web proxies, before reaching its final destination.

Implementing service chaining provides several advantages, such as enhanced visibility, improved security posture, and the ability to enforce policies consistently across the entire traffic path. It allows for the integration of various services seamlessly, ensuring that all necessary security measures are engaged without needing to rewrite network architecture or traffic flows extensively.

Other options, like service mirroring, network segmentation, and load balancing, while important in their own contexts, don’t specifically address the routing of internet-bound traffic in the same systematic and service-oriented way that service chaining does. For instance, service mirroring generally focuses on copying traffic for analysis rather than controlling traffic flow; network segmentation emphasizes isolating parts of a network for security but does not specifically facilitate internet traffic flow; and load balancing is primarily about distributing traffic loads to ensure optimal performance, rather than managing the routing of traffic through multiple security services. Therefore, service chaining is the most suitable recommendation for designing a comprehensive strategy for internet-bound